1974 Holden Torana vs. 2006 Mazda 3
To start off, 2006 Mazda 3 is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1974 Holden Torana. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1974 Holden Torana would be higher. At 2,833 cc (6 cylinders), 1974 Holden Torana is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Mazda 3 weights approximately 70 kg more than 1974 Holden Torana.
Because 1974 Holden Torana is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1974 Holden Torana. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Mazda 3, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1974 Holden Torana | 2006 Mazda 3 | |
| Make | Holden | Mazda |
| Model | Torana | 3 |
| Year Released | 1974 | 2006 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2833 cc | 1598 cc |
| Horse Power | 119 HP | 0 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Vehicle Weight | 1170 kg | 1240 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4500 mm | 4500 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1760 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1340 mm | 1470 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2590 mm | 2650 mm |
