1974 Honda 145 vs. 1996 Rover 400
To start off, 1996 Rover 400 is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1974 Honda 145. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1974 Honda 145 would be higher. At 1,589 cc (4 cylinders), 1996 Rover 400 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Rover 400 (109 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 41 more horse power than 1974 Honda 145. (68 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1996 Rover 400 should accelerate faster than 1974 Honda 145.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1996 Rover 400 (145 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 27 more torque (in Nm) than 1974 Honda 145. (118 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 1996 Rover 400 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1974 Honda 145.
Compare all specifications:
1974 Honda 145 | 1996 Rover 400 | |
Make | Honda | Rover |
Model | 145 | 400 |
Year Released | 1974 | 1996 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1433 cc | 1589 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 68 HP | 109 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 118 Nm | 145 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4150 mm | 4370 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1500 mm | 1690 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1340 mm | 1410 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2260 mm | 2560 mm |