1974 Honda 145 vs. 2009 Smart ForTwo
To start off, 2009 Smart ForTwo is newer by 35 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1974 Honda 145. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1974 Honda 145 would be higher. At 1,433 cc (4 cylinders), 1974 Honda 145 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Smart ForTwo (70 HP @ 5800 RPM) has 2 more horse power than 1974 Honda 145. (68 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Smart ForTwo should accelerate faster than 1974 Honda 145.
Because 2009 Smart ForTwo is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2009 Smart ForTwo. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1974 Honda 145, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1974 Honda 145 (118 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 26 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Smart ForTwo. (92 Nm @ 4500 RPM). This means 1974 Honda 145 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Smart ForTwo.
Compare all specifications:
1974 Honda 145 | 2009 Smart ForTwo | |
Make | Honda | Smart |
Model | 145 | ForTwo |
Year Released | 1974 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Rear |
Engine Size | 1433 cc | 999 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 68 HP | 70 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 5800 RPM |
Torque | 118 Nm | 92 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4150 mm | 2700 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1500 mm | 1550 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1340 mm | 1570 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2260 mm | 1870 mm |