1974 Humber Sceptre vs. 2001 Mazda CU-X
To start off, 2001 Mazda CU-X is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1974 Humber Sceptre. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1974 Humber Sceptre would be higher. At 1,970 cc, 2001 Mazda CU-X is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 Mazda CU-X (99 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 20 more horse power than 1974 Humber Sceptre. (79 HP @ 5200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2001 Mazda CU-X should accelerate faster than 1974 Humber Sceptre. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 Mazda CU-X weights approximately 353 kg more than 1974 Humber Sceptre. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1974 Humber Sceptre is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1974 Humber Sceptre. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 Mazda CU-X, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2001 Mazda CU-X (240 Nm) has 117 more torque (in Nm) than 1974 Humber Sceptre. (123 Nm). This means 2001 Mazda CU-X will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1974 Humber Sceptre.
Compare all specifications:
1974 Humber Sceptre | 2001 Mazda CU-X | |
Make | Humber | Mazda |
Model | Sceptre | CU-X |
Year Released | 1974 | 2001 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1725 cc | 1970 cc |
Horse Power | 79 HP | 99 HP |
Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 123 Nm | 240 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 992 kg | 1345 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2510 mm | 2680 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 45 L | 80 L |