1974 Lada 1200 vs. 1980 Mitsubishi Colt
To start off, 1980 Mitsubishi Colt is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1974 Lada 1200. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1974 Lada 1200 would be higher. At 1,242 cc (4 cylinders), 1980 Mitsubishi Colt is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1974 Lada 1200 weights approximately 186 kg more than 1980 Mitsubishi Colt.
Because 1974 Lada 1200 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1974 Lada 1200. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1980 Mitsubishi Colt, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1974 Lada 1200 | 1980 Mitsubishi Colt | |
Make | Lada | Mitsubishi |
Model | 1200 | Colt |
Year Released | 1974 | 1980 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1198 cc | 1242 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 61 HP | 0 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 996 kg | 810 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4070 mm | 3800 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1620 mm | 1590 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1360 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2430 mm | 2310 mm |