1974 Lada 1200 vs. 2006 Mitsubishi Colt
To start off, 2006 Mitsubishi Colt is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1974 Lada 1200. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1974 Lada 1200 would be higher. At 2,972 cc, 2006 Mitsubishi Colt is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Mitsubishi Colt (179 HP @ 4500 RPM) has 118 more horse power than 1974 Lada 1200. (61 HP @ 5600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Mitsubishi Colt should accelerate faster than 1974 Lada 1200.
Because 2006 Mitsubishi Colt is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1974 Lada 1200. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Mitsubishi Colt will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Mitsubishi Colt (255 Nm @ 4500 RPM) has 168 more torque (in Nm) than 1974 Lada 1200. (87 Nm @ 3400 RPM). This means 2006 Mitsubishi Colt will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1974 Lada 1200.
Compare all specifications:
1974 Lada 1200 | 2006 Mitsubishi Colt | |
Make | Lada | Mitsubishi |
Model | 1200 | Colt |
Year Released | 1974 | 2006 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1198 cc | 2972 cc |
Horse Power | 61 HP | 179 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Torque | 87 Nm | 255 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3400 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 76 mm | 91.1 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 66 mm | 76 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 8.8:1 | 9.0:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4070 mm | 4940 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1620 mm | 1780 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1810 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2430 mm | 2970 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 46 L | 95 L |