1974 Lada 1300 vs. 2009 Mazda 6
To start off, 2009 Mazda 6 is newer by 35 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1974 Lada 1300. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1974 Lada 1300 would be higher. At 2,489 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Mazda 6 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1974 Lada 1300 weights approximately 45 kg more than 2009 Mazda 6.
Because 1974 Lada 1300 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1974 Lada 1300. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Mazda 6, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1974 Lada 1300 | 2009 Mazda 6 | |
Make | Lada | Mazda |
Model | 1300 | 6 |
Year Released | 1974 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1294 cc | 2489 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 171 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1000 kg | 955 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4080 mm | 4930 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1620 mm | 1850 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1480 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2430 mm | 2800 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 39 L | 70 L |