1974 Lada 1300 vs. 2009 Mazda CX-7
To start off, 2009 Mazda CX-7 is newer by 35 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1974 Lada 1300. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1974 Lada 1300 would be higher. At 2,260 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Mazda CX-7 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Mazda CX-7 weights approximately 180 kg more than 1974 Lada 1300.
Because 1974 Lada 1300 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1974 Lada 1300. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Mazda CX-7, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2009 Mazda CX-7 has automatic transmission and 1974 Lada 1300 has manual transmission. 1974 Lada 1300 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2009 Mazda CX-7 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1974 Lada 1300 | 2009 Mazda CX-7 | |
Make | Lada | Mazda |
Model | 1300 | CX-7 |
Year Released | 1974 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1294 cc | 2260 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 244 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1000 kg | 1180 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4080 mm | 4680 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1620 mm | 1880 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1650 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2430 mm | 2760 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 39 L | 69 L |