1974 Lada 1300 vs. 2009 Nissan Pixo
To start off, 2009 Nissan Pixo is newer by 35 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1974 Lada 1300. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1974 Lada 1300 would be higher. At 1,294 cc (4 cylinders), 1974 Lada 1300 is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1974 Lada 1300 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1974 Lada 1300. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Nissan Pixo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1974 Lada 1300 | 2009 Nissan Pixo | |
| Make | Lada | Nissan |
| Model | 1300 | Pixo |
| Year Released | 1974 | 2009 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1294 cc | 996 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 68 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4080 mm | 3580 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1620 mm | 1680 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1400 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2430 mm | 2360 mm |
