1974 Lada 1300 vs. 2010 Dodge Challenger
To start off, 2010 Dodge Challenger is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1974 Lada 1300. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1974 Lada 1300 would be higher. At 3,500 cc (6 cylinders), 2010 Dodge Challenger is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Dodge Challenger weights approximately 687 kg more than 1974 Lada 1300.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2010 Dodge Challenger has automatic transmission and 1974 Lada 1300 has manual transmission. 1974 Lada 1300 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2010 Dodge Challenger will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1974 Lada 1300 | 2010 Dodge Challenger | |
Make | Lada | Dodge |
Model | 1300 | Challenger |
Year Released | 1974 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1294 cc | 3500 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 250 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1000 kg | 1687 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4080 mm | 5022 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1620 mm | 1923 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2430 mm | 2946 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 39 L | 68 L |