1974 Lada Riva vs. 1999 Renault Clio
To start off, 1999 Renault Clio is newer by 25 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1974 Lada Riva. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1974 Lada Riva would be higher. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1974 Lada Riva weights approximately 61 kg more than 1999 Renault Clio.
Because 1974 Lada Riva is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1974 Lada Riva. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1999 Renault Clio, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1974 Lada Riva | 1999 Renault Clio | |
| Make | Lada | Renault |
| Model | Riva | Clio |
| Year Released | 1974 | 1999 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Horse Power | 66 HP | 0 HP |
| Top Speed | 143 km/hour | 181 km/hour |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 996 kg | 935 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4130 mm | 3780 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1620 mm | 1650 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1430 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2420 mm | 2770 mm |
