1974 Lada Riva vs. 2010 Holden Cruze
To start off, 2010 Holden Cruze is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1974 Lada Riva. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1974 Lada Riva would be higher. At 1,991 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Holden Cruze is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Holden Cruze (148 HP) has 76 more horse power than 1974 Lada Riva. (72 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Holden Cruze should accelerate faster than 1974 Lada Riva.
Because 1974 Lada Riva is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1974 Lada Riva. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Holden Cruze, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Holden Cruze (320 Nm) has 224 more torque (in Nm) than 1974 Lada Riva. (96 Nm). This means 2010 Holden Cruze will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1974 Lada Riva.
Compare all specifications:
1974 Lada Riva | 2010 Holden Cruze | |
Make | Lada | Holden |
Model | Riva | Cruze |
Year Released | 1974 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1294 cc | 1991 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 72 HP | 148 HP |
Torque | 96 Nm | 320 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4130 mm | 4597 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1620 mm | 1788 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1477 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2420 mm | 2685 mm |