1974 Lamborghini Urraco vs. 1999 Renault Clio
To start off, 1999 Renault Clio is newer by 25 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1974 Lamborghini Urraco. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1974 Lamborghini Urraco would be higher. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1974 Lamborghini Urraco weights approximately 315 kg more than 1999 Renault Clio.
Because 1974 Lamborghini Urraco is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1974 Lamborghini Urraco. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1999 Renault Clio, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1974 Lamborghini Urraco | 1999 Renault Clio | |
| Make | Lamborghini | Renault |
| Model | Urraco | Clio |
| Year Released | 1974 | 1999 |
| Body Type | Coupe | Hatchback |
| Engine Position | Middle | Front |
| Horse Power | 182 HP | 0 HP |
| Top Speed | 205 km/hour | 181 km/hour |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 3 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1250 kg | 935 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4290 mm | 3780 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1650 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1120 mm | 1430 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2460 mm | 2770 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 80 L | 50 L |
