1974 Lancia Beta vs. 2003 Lotec C 1000
To start off, 2003 Lotec C 1000 is newer by 29 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1974 Lancia Beta. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1974 Lancia Beta would be higher. At 5,499 cc (8 cylinders), 2003 Lotec C 1000 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Lotec C 1000 (843 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 725 more horse power than 1974 Lancia Beta. (118 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2003 Lotec C 1000 should accelerate faster than 1974 Lancia Beta. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Lotec C 1000 weights approximately 40 kg more than 1974 Lancia Beta. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 Lotec C 1000 (990 Nm) has 825 more torque (in Nm) than 1974 Lancia Beta. (165 Nm). This means 2003 Lotec C 1000 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1974 Lancia Beta.
Compare all specifications:
1974 Lancia Beta | 2003 Lotec C 1000 | |
Make | Lancia | Lotec |
Model | Beta | C 1000 |
Year Released | 1974 | 2003 |
Engine Position | Middle | Middle |
Engine Size | 1994 cc | 5499 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 118 HP | 843 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 165 Nm | 990 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1040 kg | 1080 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3820 mm | 4300 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 2010 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1200 mm | 1150 mm |