1974 Lancia Beta vs. 2005 Nissan Hardbody
To start off, 2005 Nissan Hardbody is newer by 31 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1974 Lancia Beta. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1974 Lancia Beta would be higher. At 2,389 cc (4 cylinders), 2005 Nissan Hardbody is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Nissan Hardbody (155 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 37 more horse power than 1974 Lancia Beta. (118 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Nissan Hardbody should accelerate faster than 1974 Lancia Beta. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Nissan Hardbody weights approximately 245 kg more than 1974 Lancia Beta. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Nissan Hardbody (209 Nm) has 44 more torque (in Nm) than 1974 Lancia Beta. (165 Nm). This means 2005 Nissan Hardbody will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1974 Lancia Beta.
Compare all specifications:
| 1974 Lancia Beta | 2005 Nissan Hardbody | |
| Make | Lancia | Nissan |
| Model | Beta | Hardbody |
| Year Released | 1974 | 2005 |
| Engine Position | Middle | Front |
| Engine Size | 1994 cc | 2389 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 118 HP | 155 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5600 RPM |
| Torque | 165 Nm | 209 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1040 kg | 1285 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2340 mm | 2960 mm |
| Fuel Consumption Overall | 6.7 L/100km | 13.4 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 59 L | 84 L |
