1974 Lotus Eclat vs. 1956 Studebaker Sky Hawk
To start off, 1974 Lotus Eclat is newer by 18 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1956 Studebaker Sky Hawk. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1956 Studebaker Sky Hawk would be higher. At 4,735 cc (8 cylinders), 1956 Studebaker Sky Hawk is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1956 Studebaker Sky Hawk weights approximately 395 kg more than 1974 Lotus Eclat.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1974 Lotus Eclat | 1956 Studebaker Sky Hawk | |
Make | Lotus | Studebaker |
Model | Eclat | Sky Hawk |
Year Released | 1974 | 1956 |
Body Type | Coupe | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1971 cc | 4735 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 160 HP | 0 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1055 kg | 1450 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4460 mm | 5150 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1820 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1200 mm | 1530 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2440 mm | 2980 mm |