1974 Lotus Eclat vs. 1978 Audi Fox
To start off, 1978 Audi Fox is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1974 Lotus Eclat. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1974 Lotus Eclat would be higher. At 1,971 cc (4 cylinders), 1974 Lotus Eclat is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1974 Lotus Eclat weights approximately 143 kg more than 1978 Audi Fox.
Because 1974 Lotus Eclat is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1974 Lotus Eclat. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1978 Audi Fox, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1974 Lotus Eclat | 1978 Audi Fox | |
Make | Lotus | Audi |
Model | Eclat | Fox |
Year Released | 1974 | 1978 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1971 cc | 1272 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 160 HP | 0 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1055 kg | 912 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4460 mm | 4390 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1690 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1200 mm | 1380 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2440 mm | 2550 mm |