1974 Lotus Eclat vs. 2000 Renault Clio
To start off, 2000 Renault Clio is newer by 26 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1974 Lotus Eclat. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1974 Lotus Eclat would be higher. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1974 Lotus Eclat weights approximately 120 kg more than 2000 Renault Clio.
Because 1974 Lotus Eclat is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1974 Lotus Eclat. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Renault Clio, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1974 Lotus Eclat | 2000 Renault Clio | |
| Make | Lotus | Renault |
| Model | Eclat | Clio |
| Year Released | 1974 | 2000 |
| Body Type | Coupe | Hatchback |
| Horse Power | 160 HP | 0 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 3 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1055 kg | 935 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4460 mm | 3780 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1650 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1200 mm | 1430 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2440 mm | 2770 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 67 L | 50 L |
