1974 Lotus Eclat vs. 2004 Mitsubishi Outlander
To start off, 2004 Mitsubishi Outlander is newer by 30 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1974 Lotus Eclat. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1974 Lotus Eclat would be higher. At 2,343 cc (4 cylinders), 2004 Mitsubishi Outlander is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Mitsubishi Outlander (162 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 2 more horse power than 1974 Lotus Eclat. (160 HP @ 6200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Mitsubishi Outlander should accelerate faster than 1974 Lotus Eclat. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Mitsubishi Outlander weights approximately 415 kg more than 1974 Lotus Eclat. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Mitsubishi Outlander (215 Nm) has 25 more torque (in Nm) than 1974 Lotus Eclat. (190 Nm). This means 2004 Mitsubishi Outlander will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1974 Lotus Eclat.
Compare all specifications:
1974 Lotus Eclat | 2004 Mitsubishi Outlander | |
Make | Lotus | Mitsubishi |
Model | Eclat | Outlander |
Year Released | 1974 | 2004 |
Body Type | Coupe | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1971 cc | 2343 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 160 HP | 162 HP |
Engine RPM | 6200 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 190 Nm | 215 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 95.2 mm | 87 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 69.3 mm | 100 mm |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1055 kg | 1470 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4460 mm | 4550 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1760 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1200 mm | 1690 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2440 mm | 2760 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 67 L | 59 L |