1974 Lotus Eclat vs. 2012 Citroen C-Crosser
To start off, 2012 Citroen C-Crosser is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1974 Lotus Eclat. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1974 Lotus Eclat would be higher. At 2,359 cc (4 cylinders), 2012 Citroen C-Crosser is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Citroen C-Crosser (168 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 8 more horse power than 1974 Lotus Eclat. (160 HP @ 6200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Citroen C-Crosser should accelerate faster than 1974 Lotus Eclat.
Because 2012 Citroen C-Crosser is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1974 Lotus Eclat. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Citroen C-Crosser will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Citroen C-Crosser (232 Nm @ 4100 RPM) has 41 more torque (in Nm) than 1974 Lotus Eclat. (191 Nm @ 4900 RPM). This means 2012 Citroen C-Crosser will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1974 Lotus Eclat.
Compare all specifications:
1974 Lotus Eclat | 2012 Citroen C-Crosser | |
Make | Lotus | Citroen |
Model | Eclat | C-Crosser |
Year Released | 1974 | 2012 |
Body Type | Coupe | Crossover |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1973 cc | 2359 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 160 HP | 168 HP |
Engine RPM | 6200 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 191 Nm | 232 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4900 RPM | 4100 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 95.2 mm | 88 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 69.3 mm | 87 mm |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |