1974 Lotus Eclat vs. 2013 Cadillac CTS

To start off, 2013 Cadillac CTS is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1974 Lotus Eclat. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1974 Lotus Eclat would be higher. At 3,600 cc (6 cylinders), 2013 Cadillac CTS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Cadillac CTS (314 HP @ 6800 RPM) has 154 more horse power than 1974 Lotus Eclat. (160 HP @ 6200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Cadillac CTS should accelerate faster than 1974 Lotus Eclat. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Cadillac CTS weights approximately 713 kg more than 1974 Lotus Eclat. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 Cadillac CTS (373 Nm @ 4900 RPM) has 183 more torque (in Nm) than 1974 Lotus Eclat. (190 Nm @ 4900 RPM). This means 2013 Cadillac CTS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1974 Lotus Eclat. 2013 Cadillac CTS has automatic transmission and 1974 Lotus Eclat has manual transmission. 1974 Lotus Eclat will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2013 Cadillac CTS will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications:

1974 Lotus Eclat 2013 Cadillac CTS
Make Lotus Cadillac
Model Eclat CTS
Year Released 1974 2013
Body Type Coupe Coupe
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 1971 cc 3600 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 6 cylinders
Engine Type in-line V
Horse Power 160 HP 314 HP
Engine RPM 6200 RPM 6800 RPM
Torque 190 Nm 373 Nm
Torque RPM 4900 RPM 4900 RPM
Engine Bore Size 95.2 mm 94 mm
Engine Stroke Size 69.3 mm 86 mm
Engine Compression Ratio 9.5:1 11.3
Drive Type Rear Rear
Transmission Type Manual 6-speed automatic
Number of Seats 4 seats 4 seats
Number of Doors 2 doors 2 doors
Vehicle Weight 1055 kg 1768 kg
Vehicle Length 4460 mm 4788 mm
Vehicle Width 1820 mm 1882 mm
Vehicle Height 1200 mm 1442 mm
Wheelbase Size 2440 mm 2880 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 67 L 68 L


 

More Comparisons

Resources

Replacing Your Front Disc Brakes Made Simple: The Definitive DIY Guide
Replace the front disc brakes of your vehicle and save money on labour cost. Read this guide to learn how. [read more]
What to look for when buying a used/second hand car.
Diligence through every step of the buying process will help you find a reliable used car and avoid any unpleasant surprises. [read more]
Step-by-Step Guide on How to Perform an Oil Change on Your Car
One of the most effective ways of saving money on car maintenance is to change the oil yourself. [read more]