1974 Mazda 1000 vs. 2010 Renault Fluence

To start off, 2010 Renault Fluence is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1974 Mazda 1000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1974 Mazda 1000 would be higher. At 1,500 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Renault Fluence is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Renault Fluence (110 HP) has 61 more horse power than 1974 Mazda 1000. (49 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Renault Fluence should accelerate faster than 1974 Mazda 1000. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Renault Fluence weights approximately 515 kg more than 1974 Mazda 1000. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1974 Mazda 1000 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1974 Mazda 1000. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Renault Fluence, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2010 Renault Fluence has automatic transmission and 1974 Mazda 1000 has manual transmission. 1974 Mazda 1000 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2010 Renault Fluence will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications: