1974 Mazda 110 S vs. 2004 Cadillac CTS
To start off, 2004 Cadillac CTS is newer by 30 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1974 Mazda 110 S. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1974 Mazda 110 S would be higher. At 3,173 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Cadillac CTS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Cadillac CTS (215 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 107 more horse power than 1974 Mazda 110 S. (108 HP @ 7000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Cadillac CTS should accelerate faster than 1974 Mazda 110 S. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Cadillac CTS weights approximately 830 kg more than 1974 Mazda 110 S. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Cadillac CTS (300 Nm @ 3400 RPM) has 157 more torque (in Nm) than 1974 Mazda 110 S. (143 Nm @ 5000 RPM). This means 2004 Cadillac CTS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1974 Mazda 110 S.
Compare all specifications:
| 1974 Mazda 110 S | 2004 Cadillac CTS | |
| Make | Mazda | Cadillac |
| Model | 110 S | CTS |
| Year Released | 1974 | 2004 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1964 cc | 3173 cc |
| Horse Power | 108 HP | 215 HP |
| Engine RPM | 7000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 143 Nm | 300 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 5000 RPM | 3400 RPM |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 960 kg | 1790 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4140 mm | 4830 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1610 mm | 1800 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1180 mm | 1450 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2360 mm | 2750 mm |
