1974 Mazda 110 S vs. 2009 Mazda CX-9
To start off, 2009 Mazda CX-9 is newer by 35 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1974 Mazda 110 S. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1974 Mazda 110 S would be higher. At 3,726 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Mazda CX-9 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Mazda CX-9 (273 HP @ 6250 RPM) has 165 more horse power than 1974 Mazda 110 S. (108 HP @ 7000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Mazda CX-9 should accelerate faster than 1974 Mazda 110 S. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Mazda CX-9 weights approximately 369 kg more than 1974 Mazda 110 S. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2009 Mazda CX-9 (366 Nm @ 4500 RPM) has 223 more torque (in Nm) than 1974 Mazda 110 S. (143 Nm @ 5000 RPM). This means 2009 Mazda CX-9 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1974 Mazda 110 S.
Compare all specifications:
1974 Mazda 110 S | 2009 Mazda CX-9 | |
Make | Mazda | Mazda |
Model | 110 S | CX-9 |
Year Released | 1974 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1964 cc | 3726 cc |
Horse Power | 108 HP | 273 HP |
Engine RPM | 7000 RPM | 6250 RPM |
Torque | 143 Nm | 366 Nm |
Torque RPM | 5000 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 7 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 960 kg | 1329 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4140 mm | 5080 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1610 mm | 1940 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1180 mm | 1730 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2360 mm | 2880 mm |