1974 Mazda 110 S vs. 2012 Jaguar XF
To start off, 2012 Jaguar XF is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1974 Mazda 110 S. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1974 Mazda 110 S would be higher. At 5,000 cc (8 cylinders), 2012 Jaguar XF is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Jaguar XF (510 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 402 more horse power than 1974 Mazda 110 S. (108 HP @ 7000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Jaguar XF should accelerate faster than 1974 Mazda 110 S. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Jaguar XF weights approximately 993 kg more than 1974 Mazda 110 S. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2012 Jaguar XF (624 Nm @ 2500 RPM) has 481 more torque (in Nm) than 1974 Mazda 110 S. (143 Nm @ 5000 RPM). This means 2012 Jaguar XF will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1974 Mazda 110 S.
Compare all specifications:
1974 Mazda 110 S | 2012 Jaguar XF | |
Make | Mazda | Jaguar |
Model | 110 S | XF |
Year Released | 1974 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1964 cc | 5000 cc |
Horse Power | 108 HP | 510 HP |
Engine RPM | 7000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 143 Nm | 624 Nm |
Torque RPM | 5000 RPM | 2500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 960 kg | 1953 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4140 mm | 4961 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1610 mm | 1877 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1180 mm | 1461 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2360 mm | 2908 mm |