1974 Mazda 110 S vs. 2013 Cadillac CTS
To start off, 2013 Cadillac CTS is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1974 Mazda 110 S. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1974 Mazda 110 S would be higher. At 3,600 cc (6 cylinders), 2013 Cadillac CTS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Cadillac CTS (314 HP @ 6800 RPM) has 206 more horse power than 1974 Mazda 110 S. (108 HP @ 7000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Cadillac CTS should accelerate faster than 1974 Mazda 110 S. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Cadillac CTS weights approximately 897 kg more than 1974 Mazda 110 S. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2013 Cadillac CTS (373 Nm @ 4900 RPM) has 230 more torque (in Nm) than 1974 Mazda 110 S. (143 Nm @ 5000 RPM). This means 2013 Cadillac CTS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1974 Mazda 110 S.
Compare all specifications:
1974 Mazda 110 S | 2013 Cadillac CTS | |
Make | Mazda | Cadillac |
Model | 110 S | CTS |
Year Released | 1974 | 2013 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1964 cc | 3600 cc |
Horse Power | 108 HP | 314 HP |
Engine RPM | 7000 RPM | 6800 RPM |
Torque | 143 Nm | 373 Nm |
Torque RPM | 5000 RPM | 4900 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 960 kg | 1857 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4140 mm | 4877 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1610 mm | 1842 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1180 mm | 1473 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2360 mm | 2880 mm |