1974 Mazda 616 vs. 1980 Holden Commodore
To start off, 1980 Holden Commodore is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1974 Mazda 616. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1974 Mazda 616 would be higher. At 2,838 cc (6 cylinders), 1980 Holden Commodore is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1980 Holden Commodore (102 HP @ 4400 RPM) has 23 more horse power than 1974 Mazda 616. (79 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1980 Holden Commodore should accelerate faster than 1974 Mazda 616. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1980 Holden Commodore weights approximately 308 kg more than 1974 Mazda 616. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1980 Holden Commodore (192 Nm @ 2800 RPM) has 68 more torque (in Nm) than 1974 Mazda 616. (124 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 1980 Holden Commodore will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1974 Mazda 616.
Compare all specifications:
1974 Mazda 616 | 1980 Holden Commodore | |
Make | Mazda | Holden |
Model | 616 | Commodore |
Year Released | 1974 | 1980 |
Body Type | Coupe | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1586 cc | 2838 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 79 HP | 102 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 4400 RPM |
Torque | 124 Nm | 192 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 2800 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 912 kg | 1220 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4160 mm | 4710 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1590 mm | 1730 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1380 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2480 mm | 2670 mm |