1974 Mazda 616 vs. 1980 Oldsmobile Ninety-Eight
To start off, 1980 Oldsmobile Ninety-Eight is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1974 Mazda 616. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1974 Mazda 616 would be higher. At 4,129 cc (6 cylinders), 1980 Oldsmobile Ninety-Eight is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1980 Oldsmobile Ninety-Eight (123 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 44 more horse power than 1974 Mazda 616. (79 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1980 Oldsmobile Ninety-Eight should accelerate faster than 1974 Mazda 616. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1980 Oldsmobile Ninety-Eight weights approximately 843 kg more than 1974 Mazda 616. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1980 Oldsmobile Ninety-Eight (278 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 154 more torque (in Nm) than 1974 Mazda 616. (124 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 1980 Oldsmobile Ninety-Eight will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1974 Mazda 616.
Compare all specifications:
1974 Mazda 616 | 1980 Oldsmobile Ninety-Eight | |
Make | Mazda | Oldsmobile |
Model | 616 | Ninety-Eight |
Year Released | 1974 | 1980 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1586 cc | 4129 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 79 HP | 123 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 124 Nm | 278 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 2000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Vehicle Weight | 912 kg | 1755 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4160 mm | 5610 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1590 mm | 1960 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1420 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2480 mm | 3030 mm |