1974 Mazda 616 vs. 2010 Cadillac SRX
To start off, 2010 Cadillac SRX is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1974 Mazda 616. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1974 Mazda 616 would be higher. At 3,000 cc (6 cylinders), 2010 Cadillac SRX is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Cadillac SRX (265 HP @ 6950 RPM) has 186 more horse power than 1974 Mazda 616. (79 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Cadillac SRX should accelerate faster than 1974 Mazda 616. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Cadillac SRX weights approximately 1004 kg more than 1974 Mazda 616. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2010 Cadillac SRX (302 Nm @ 5100 RPM) has 178 more torque (in Nm) than 1974 Mazda 616. (124 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 2010 Cadillac SRX will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1974 Mazda 616.
Compare all specifications:
1974 Mazda 616 | 2010 Cadillac SRX | |
Make | Mazda | Cadillac |
Model | 616 | SRX |
Year Released | 1974 | 2010 |
Body Type | Coupe | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1586 cc | 3000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 79 HP | 265 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 6950 RPM |
Torque | 124 Nm | 302 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 5100 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 912 kg | 1916 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4160 mm | 4834 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1590 mm | 1910 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1669 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2480 mm | 2807 mm |