1974 Mazda 616 vs. 2010 Fiat Stilo
To start off, 2010 Fiat Stilo is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1974 Mazda 616. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1974 Mazda 616 would be higher. At 2,446 cc (5 cylinders), 2010 Fiat Stilo is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Fiat Stilo weights approximately 353 kg more than 1974 Mazda 616.
Let's talk about torque, 2010 Fiat Stilo (221 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 97 more torque (in Nm) than 1974 Mazda 616. (124 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 2010 Fiat Stilo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1974 Mazda 616.
Compare all specifications:
1974 Mazda 616 | 2010 Fiat Stilo | |
Make | Mazda | Fiat |
Model | 616 | Stilo |
Year Released | 1974 | 2010 |
Body Type | Coupe | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1586 cc | 2446 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 79 HP | 0 HP |
Torque | 124 Nm | 221 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 3500 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 78 mm | 83.1 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 83 mm | 90.4 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 912 kg | 1265 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4160 mm | 4190 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1590 mm | 1790 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1480 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2480 mm | 2610 mm |