1974 Mazda 818 vs. 2010 Peugeot 408
To start off, 2010 Peugeot 408 is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1974 Mazda 818. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1974 Mazda 818 would be higher. At 1,997 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Peugeot 408 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Peugeot 408 (147 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 79 more horse power than 1974 Mazda 818. (68 HP @ 6200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Peugeot 408 should accelerate faster than 1974 Mazda 818.
Because 1974 Mazda 818 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1974 Mazda 818. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Peugeot 408, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Peugeot 408 (200 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 108 more torque (in Nm) than 1974 Mazda 818. (92 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2010 Peugeot 408 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1974 Mazda 818.
Compare all specifications:
1974 Mazda 818 | 2010 Peugeot 408 | |
Make | Mazda | Peugeot |
Model | 818 | 408 |
Year Released | 1974 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1272 cc | 1997 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 68 HP | 147 HP |
Engine RPM | 6200 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 92 Nm | 200 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Length | 4100 mm | 4680 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1600 mm | 1815 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1525 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2320 mm | 2710 mm |