1974 Mazda 818 vs. 2010 Renault Clio
To start off, 2010 Renault Clio is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1974 Mazda 818. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1974 Mazda 818 would be higher. At 1,460 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Renault Clio is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Renault Clio (81 HP @ 3750 RPM) has 13 more horse power than 1974 Mazda 818. (68 HP @ 6200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Renault Clio should accelerate faster than 1974 Mazda 818. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Renault Clio weights approximately 175 kg more than 1974 Mazda 818. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1974 Mazda 818 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1974 Mazda 818. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Renault Clio, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Renault Clio (200 Nm @ 1900 RPM) has 108 more torque (in Nm) than 1974 Mazda 818. (92 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2010 Renault Clio will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1974 Mazda 818.
Compare all specifications:
1974 Mazda 818 | 2010 Renault Clio | |
Make | Mazda | Renault |
Model | 818 | Clio |
Year Released | 1974 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1272 cc | 1460 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 68 HP | 81 HP |
Engine RPM | 6200 RPM | 3750 RPM |
Torque | 92 Nm | 200 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 1900 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1000 kg | 1175 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4100 mm | 3990 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1600 mm | 2030 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1710 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2320 mm | 2580 mm |