1974 Mazda 818 vs. 2010 Renault Trafic
To start off, 2010 Renault Trafic is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1974 Mazda 818. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1974 Mazda 818 would be higher. At 1,870 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Renault Trafic is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Renault Trafic (100 HP @ 3500 RPM) has 32 more horse power than 1974 Mazda 818. (68 HP @ 6200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Renault Trafic should accelerate faster than 1974 Mazda 818.
Because 1974 Mazda 818 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1974 Mazda 818. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Renault Trafic, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Renault Trafic (241 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 149 more torque (in Nm) than 1974 Mazda 818. (92 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2010 Renault Trafic will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1974 Mazda 818.
Compare all specifications:
1974 Mazda 818 | 2010 Renault Trafic | |
Make | Mazda | Renault |
Model | 818 | Trafic |
Year Released | 1974 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1272 cc | 1870 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 68 HP | 100 HP |
Engine RPM | 6200 RPM | 3500 RPM |
Torque | 92 Nm | 241 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 2000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Length | 4100 mm | 4790 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1600 mm | 1950 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1910 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2320 mm | 3100 mm |