1974 Mazda 929 vs. 2002 Volvo S80
To start off, 2002 Volvo S80 is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1974 Mazda 929. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1974 Mazda 929 would be higher. At 2,520 cc (5 cylinders), 2002 Volvo S80 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Volvo S80 (197 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 114 more horse power than 1974 Mazda 929. (83 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2002 Volvo S80 should accelerate faster than 1974 Mazda 929. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Volvo S80 weights approximately 355 kg more than 1974 Mazda 929. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2002 Volvo S80 (285 Nm @ 1800 RPM) has 151 more torque (in Nm) than 1974 Mazda 929. (134 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2002 Volvo S80 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1974 Mazda 929.
Compare all specifications:
1974 Mazda 929 | 2002 Volvo S80 | |
Make | Mazda | Volvo |
Model | 929 | S80 |
Year Released | 1974 | 2002 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1769 cc | 2520 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 83 HP | 197 HP |
Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 134 Nm | 285 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 1800 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 80 mm | 83 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 88 mm | 90 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 8.6:1 | 9.0:1 |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1070 kg | 1425 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4550 mm | 4830 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1670 mm | 1840 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1440 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2520 mm | 2720 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 55 L | 80 L |