1974 Mazda 929 vs. 2004 Peugeot 206
To start off, 2004 Peugeot 206 is newer by 30 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1974 Mazda 929. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1974 Mazda 929 would be higher. At 1,767 cc (4 cylinders), 1974 Mazda 929 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Peugeot 206 (108 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 25 more horse power than 1974 Mazda 929. (83 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Peugeot 206 should accelerate faster than 1974 Mazda 929. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Peugeot 206 weights approximately 51 kg more than 1974 Mazda 929. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1974 Mazda 929 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1974 Mazda 929. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Peugeot 206, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Peugeot 206 (147 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 13 more torque (in Nm) than 1974 Mazda 929. (134 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 2004 Peugeot 206 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1974 Mazda 929.
Compare all specifications:
1974 Mazda 929 | 2004 Peugeot 206 | |
Make | Mazda | Peugeot |
Model | 929 | 206 |
Year Released | 1974 | 2004 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1767 cc | 1580 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 83 HP | 108 HP |
Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 134 Nm | 147 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 80 mm | 78.5 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 88 mm | 82 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 8.6:1 | 11.0:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1095 kg | 1146 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4410 mm | 3840 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1670 mm | 1680 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1380 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2520 mm | 2450 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 65 L | 47 L |