1974 Mazda 929 vs. 2010 Citroen C1
To start off, 2010 Citroen C1 is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1974 Mazda 929. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1974 Mazda 929 would be higher. At 1,767 cc (4 cylinders), 1974 Mazda 929 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1974 Mazda 929 (83 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 16 more horse power than 2010 Citroen C1. (67 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1974 Mazda 929 should accelerate faster than 2010 Citroen C1. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1974 Mazda 929 weights approximately 295 kg more than 2010 Citroen C1. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1974 Mazda 929 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1974 Mazda 929. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Citroen C1, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1974 Mazda 929 (134 Nm @ 2500 RPM) has 41 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 Citroen C1. (93 Nm @ 3600 RPM). This means 1974 Mazda 929 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 Citroen C1.
Compare all specifications:
1974 Mazda 929 | 2010 Citroen C1 | |
Make | Mazda | Citroen |
Model | 929 | C1 |
Year Released | 1974 | 2010 |
Body Type | Coupe | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1767 cc | 998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 83 HP | 67 HP |
Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 134 Nm | 93 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 3600 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 80 mm | 73.7 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 88 mm | 82 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 8.6:1 | 10.8:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1095 kg | 800 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4410 mm | 3440 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1670 mm | 1480 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1640 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2520 mm | 2350 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 65 L | 41 L |