1974 Mazda 929 vs. 2010 Ford F-250
To start off, 2010 Ford F-250 is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1974 Mazda 929. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1974 Mazda 929 would be higher. At 5,400 cc (8 cylinders), 2010 Ford F-250 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Ford F-250 (300 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 217 more horse power than 1974 Mazda 929. (83 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Ford F-250 should accelerate faster than 1974 Mazda 929. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Ford F-250 weights approximately 1735 kg more than 1974 Mazda 929. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2010 Ford F-250 (494 Nm @ 3750 RPM) has 360 more torque (in Nm) than 1974 Mazda 929. (134 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2010 Ford F-250 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1974 Mazda 929.
Compare all specifications:
1974 Mazda 929 | 2010 Ford F-250 | |
Make | Mazda | Ford |
Model | 929 | F-250 |
Year Released | 1974 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1769 cc | 5400 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 83 HP | 300 HP |
Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 134 Nm | 494 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 3750 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Vehicle Weight | 1070 kg | 2805 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4550 mm | 6253 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1670 mm | 2029 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1961 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2520 mm | 3967 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 55 L | 115 L |