1974 Mazda 929 vs. 2010 Holden Epica
To start off, 2010 Holden Epica is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1974 Mazda 929. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1974 Mazda 929 would be higher. At 1,991 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Holden Epica is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Holden Epica (148 HP) has 65 more horse power than 1974 Mazda 929. (83 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Holden Epica should accelerate faster than 1974 Mazda 929.
Let's talk about torque, 2010 Holden Epica (320 Nm) has 186 more torque (in Nm) than 1974 Mazda 929. (134 Nm). This means 2010 Holden Epica will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1974 Mazda 929.
Compare all specifications:
| 1974 Mazda 929 | 2010 Holden Epica | |
| Make | Mazda | Holden |
| Model | 929 | Epica |
| Year Released | 1974 | 2010 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1769 cc | 1991 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 83 HP | 148 HP |
| Torque | 134 Nm | 320 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4550 mm | 4805 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1670 mm | 1810 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1450 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2520 mm | 2700 mm |
