1974 Mazda 929 vs. 2011 Ford Fusion
To start off, 2011 Ford Fusion is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1974 Mazda 929. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1974 Mazda 929 would be higher. At 2,500 cc (4 cylinders), 2011 Ford Fusion is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Ford Fusion (175 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 92 more horse power than 1974 Mazda 929. (83 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Ford Fusion should accelerate faster than 1974 Mazda 929. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2011 Ford Fusion weights approximately 421 kg more than 1974 Mazda 929. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1974 Mazda 929 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1974 Mazda 929. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2011 Ford Fusion, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2011 Ford Fusion (233 Nm @ 4500 RPM) has 99 more torque (in Nm) than 1974 Mazda 929. (134 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 2011 Ford Fusion will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1974 Mazda 929. 2011 Ford Fusion has automatic transmission and 1974 Mazda 929 has manual transmission. 1974 Mazda 929 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2011 Ford Fusion will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1974 Mazda 929 | 2011 Ford Fusion | |
| Make | Mazda | Ford |
| Model | 929 | Fusion |
| Year Released | 1974 | 2011 |
| Body Type | Sedan | Sedan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1769 cc | 2500 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 83 HP | 175 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 134 Nm | 233 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 4500 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1095 kg | 1516 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4410 mm | 4841 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1670 mm | 1834 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1445 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2520 mm | 2728 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 65 L | 66 L |
