1974 Mazda Chante vs. 2002 MCC Crossblade
To start off, 2002 MCC Crossblade is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1974 Mazda Chante. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1974 Mazda Chante would be higher. At 599 cc (3 cylinders), 2002 MCC Crossblade is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 MCC Crossblade (70 HP) has 40 more horse power than 1974 Mazda Chante. (30 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2002 MCC Crossblade should accelerate faster than 1974 Mazda Chante. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 MCC Crossblade weights approximately 250 kg more than 1974 Mazda Chante. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2002 MCC Crossblade (102 Nm @ 3210 RPM) has 62 more torque (in Nm) than 1974 Mazda Chante. (40 Nm @ 5500 RPM). This means 2002 MCC Crossblade will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1974 Mazda Chante.
Compare all specifications:
| 1974 Mazda Chante | 2002 MCC Crossblade | |
| Make | Mazda | MCC |
| Model | Chante | Crossblade |
| Year Released | 1974 | 2002 |
| Engine Size | 359 cc | 599 cc |
| Horse Power | 30 HP | 70 HP |
| Torque | 40 Nm | 102 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 5500 RPM | 3210 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Vehicle Weight | 490 kg | 740 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3000 mm | 2630 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1300 mm | 1630 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1300 mm | 1520 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2210 mm | 1810 mm |
