1974 Mazda Luce vs. 2002 Renault Clio
To start off, 2002 Renault Clio is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1974 Mazda Luce. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1974 Mazda Luce would be higher. At 2,620 cc, 1974 Mazda Luce is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1974 Mazda Luce (107 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 11 more horse power than 2002 Renault Clio. (96 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1974 Mazda Luce should accelerate faster than 2002 Renault Clio. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1974 Mazda Luce weights approximately 225 kg more than 2002 Renault Clio. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1974 Mazda Luce (175 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 48 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Renault Clio. (127 Nm @ 3750 RPM). This means 1974 Mazda Luce will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Renault Clio.
Compare all specifications:
| 1974 Mazda Luce | 2002 Renault Clio | |
| Make | Mazda | Renault |
| Model | Luce | Clio |
| Year Released | 1974 | 2002 |
| Body Type | Coupe | Hatchback |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2620 cc | 1390 cc |
| Horse Power | 107 HP | 96 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 175 Nm | 127 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 3750 RPM |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1255 kg | 1030 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4590 mm | 3780 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1640 mm | 1650 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1420 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2590 mm | 2480 mm |
