1974 Mazda Luce vs. 2005 Renault Clio
To start off, 2005 Renault Clio is newer by 31 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1974 Mazda Luce. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1974 Mazda Luce would be higher. At 2,945 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Renault Clio is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Renault Clio (251 HP @ 7150 RPM) has 144 more horse power than 1974 Mazda Luce. (107 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Renault Clio should accelerate faster than 1974 Mazda Luce. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Renault Clio weights approximately 155 kg more than 1974 Mazda Luce. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2005 Renault Clio (300 Nm @ 4650 RPM) has 125 more torque (in Nm) than 1974 Mazda Luce. (175 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 2005 Renault Clio will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1974 Mazda Luce.
Compare all specifications:
1974 Mazda Luce | 2005 Renault Clio | |
Make | Mazda | Renault |
Model | Luce | Clio |
Year Released | 1974 | 2005 |
Body Type | Coupe | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Middle |
Engine Size | 2620 cc | 2945 cc |
Horse Power | 107 HP | 251 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 7150 RPM |
Torque | 175 Nm | 300 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 4650 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 2 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1255 kg | 1410 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4590 mm | 3850 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1640 mm | 1840 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1360 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2590 mm | 2590 mm |