1974 Mazda RX-2 vs. 1946 Volvo PV 60
To start off, 1974 Mazda RX-2 is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1946 Volvo PV 60. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1946 Volvo PV 60 would be higher. At 3,670 cc (6 cylinders), 1946 Volvo PV 60 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1974 Mazda RX-2 (119 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 34 more horse power than 1946 Volvo PV 60. (85 HP @ 3400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1974 Mazda RX-2 should accelerate faster than 1946 Volvo PV 60. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1946 Volvo PV 60 weights approximately 670 kg more than 1974 Mazda RX-2.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1974 Mazda RX-2 | 1946 Volvo PV 60 | |
Make | Mazda | Volvo |
Model | RX-2 | PV 60 |
Year Released | 1974 | 1946 |
Engine Size | 2292 cc | 3670 cc |
Engine Type | dual-disk rotary | in-line |
Horse Power | 119 HP | 85 HP |
Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 3400 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 960 kg | 1630 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2480 mm | 2850 mm |