1974 Mazda RX-2 vs. 1965 Triumph 2000
To start off, 1974 Mazda RX-2 is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Triumph 2000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Triumph 2000 would be higher. At 2,292 cc, 1974 Mazda RX-2 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1974 Mazda RX-2 (119 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 30 more horse power than 1965 Triumph 2000. (89 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1974 Mazda RX-2 should accelerate faster than 1965 Triumph 2000. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1965 Triumph 2000 weights approximately 210 kg more than 1974 Mazda RX-2.
Let's talk about torque, 1965 Triumph 2000 (158 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 1 more torque (in Nm) than 1974 Mazda RX-2. (157 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 1965 Triumph 2000 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1974 Mazda RX-2.
Compare all specifications:
| 1974 Mazda RX-2 | 1965 Triumph 2000 | |
| Make | Mazda | Triumph |
| Model | RX-2 | 2000 |
| Year Released | 1974 | 1965 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2292 cc | 1997 cc |
| Engine Type | dual-disk rotary | in-line |
| Horse Power | 119 HP | 89 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 5000 RPM |
| Torque | 157 Nm | 158 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 3000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 960 kg | 1170 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4160 mm | 4420 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1590 mm | 1660 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1430 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2480 mm | 2700 mm |
