1974 Mazda RX-2 vs. 1996 Nissan R 390 GT1
To start off, 1996 Nissan R 390 GT1 is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1974 Mazda RX-2. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1974 Mazda RX-2 would be higher. At 3,493 cc (8 cylinders), 1996 Nissan R 390 GT1 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Nissan R 390 GT1 (550 HP) has 431 more horse power than 1974 Mazda RX-2. (119 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1996 Nissan R 390 GT1 should accelerate faster than 1974 Mazda RX-2.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1996 Nissan R 390 GT1 (637 Nm) has 480 more torque (in Nm) than 1974 Mazda RX-2. (157 Nm). This means 1996 Nissan R 390 GT1 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1974 Mazda RX-2.
Compare all specifications:
| 1974 Mazda RX-2 | 1996 Nissan R 390 GT1 | |
| Make | Mazda | Nissan |
| Model | RX-2 | R 390 GT1 |
| Year Released | 1974 | 1996 |
| Engine Position | Front | Middle |
| Engine Size | 2292 cc | 3493 cc |
| Engine Type | dual-disk rotary | V |
| Horse Power | 119 HP | 550 HP |
| Torque | 157 Nm | 637 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 4160 mm | 4730 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1590 mm | 2010 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1150 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2480 mm | 2720 mm |
