1974 Mazda RX-2 vs. 2003 SsangYong Korando
To start off, 2003 SsangYong Korando is newer by 29 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1974 Mazda RX-2. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1974 Mazda RX-2 would be higher. At 2,874 cc (5 cylinders), 2003 SsangYong Korando is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1974 Mazda RX-2 (119 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 1 more horse power than 2003 SsangYong Korando. (118 HP @ 4100 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1974 Mazda RX-2 should accelerate faster than 2003 SsangYong Korando.
Because 2003 SsangYong Korando is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1974 Mazda RX-2. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 SsangYong Korando will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 SsangYong Korando (256 Nm @ 2400 RPM) has 99 more torque (in Nm) than 1974 Mazda RX-2. (157 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 2003 SsangYong Korando will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1974 Mazda RX-2.
Compare all specifications:
1974 Mazda RX-2 | 2003 SsangYong Korando | |
Make | Mazda | SsangYong |
Model | RX-2 | Korando |
Year Released | 1974 | 2003 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2292 cc | 2874 cc |
Engine Type | dual-disk rotary | in-line |
Horse Power | 119 HP | 118 HP |
Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 4100 RPM |
Torque | 157 Nm | 256 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 2400 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4160 mm | 4340 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1590 mm | 1850 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1850 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2480 mm | 2490 mm |