1974 Mazda RX-2 vs. 2006 Smart ForFour

To start off, 2006 Smart ForFour is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1974 Mazda RX-2. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1974 Mazda RX-2 would be higher. At 2,292 cc, 1974 Mazda RX-2 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1974 Mazda RX-2 (119 HP) has 56 more horse power than 2006 Smart ForFour. (63 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1974 Mazda RX-2 should accelerate faster than 2006 Smart ForFour. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Smart ForFour weights approximately 6 kg more than 1974 Mazda RX-2.

Because 1974 Mazda RX-2 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1974 Mazda RX-2. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Smart ForFour, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1974 Mazda RX-2 (157 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 65 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Smart ForFour. (92 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 1974 Mazda RX-2 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Smart ForFour.

Compare all specifications:

1974 Mazda RX-2 2006 Smart ForFour
Make Mazda Smart
Model RX-2 ForFour
Year Released 1974 2006
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 2292 cc 1124 cc
Engine Type dual-disk rotary in-line
Horse Power 119 HP 63 HP
Torque 157 Nm 92 Nm
Torque RPM 3500 RPM 2500 RPM
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline - Premium
Drive Type Rear Front
Number of Seats 5 seats 5 seats
Vehicle Weight 960 kg 966 kg
Vehicle Length 4160 mm 3760 mm
Vehicle Width 1590 mm 1690 mm
Vehicle Height 1400 mm 1460 mm
Wheelbase Size 2480 mm 2510 mm