1974 Mazda RX-2 vs. 2011 Volvo C70
To start off, 2011 Volvo C70 is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1974 Mazda RX-2. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1974 Mazda RX-2 would be higher. At 2,400 cc (5 cylinders), 2011 Volvo C70 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2011 Volvo C70 weights approximately 780 kg more than 1974 Mazda RX-2.
Because 1974 Mazda RX-2 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1974 Mazda RX-2. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2011 Volvo C70, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2011 Volvo C70 (350 Nm) has 193 more torque (in Nm) than 1974 Mazda RX-2. (157 Nm). This means 2011 Volvo C70 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1974 Mazda RX-2.
Compare all specifications:
1974 Mazda RX-2 | 2011 Volvo C70 | |
Make | Mazda | Volvo |
Model | RX-2 | C70 |
Year Released | 1974 | 2011 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2292 cc | 2400 cc |
Engine Type | dual-disk rotary | in-line |
Horse Power | 119 HP | 0 HP |
Torque | 157 Nm | 350 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 960 kg | 1740 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4160 mm | 4582 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1590 mm | 1836 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1400 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2480 mm | 2639 mm |