1974 Mazda RX-2 vs. 2012 Chevrolet Captiva
To start off, 2012 Chevrolet Captiva is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1974 Mazda RX-2. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1974 Mazda RX-2 would be higher. At 2,292 cc, 1974 Mazda RX-2 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Chevrolet Captiva (161 HP @ 3800 RPM) has 42 more horse power than 1974 Mazda RX-2. (119 HP @ 6500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Chevrolet Captiva should accelerate faster than 1974 Mazda RX-2.
Because 1974 Mazda RX-2 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1974 Mazda RX-2. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Chevrolet Captiva, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Chevrolet Captiva (350 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 193 more torque (in Nm) than 1974 Mazda RX-2. (157 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 2012 Chevrolet Captiva will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1974 Mazda RX-2.
Compare all specifications:
1974 Mazda RX-2 | 2012 Chevrolet Captiva | |
Make | Mazda | Chevrolet |
Model | RX-2 | Captiva |
Year Released | 1974 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2292 cc | 2231 cc |
Engine Type | dual-disk rotary | in-line |
Horse Power | 119 HP | 161 HP |
Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 3800 RPM |
Torque | 157 Nm | 350 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 2000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4160 mm | 4673 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1590 mm | 1849 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1756 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2480 mm | 2707 mm |