1974 Mazda RX-2 vs. 2012 SsangYong Chairman W
To start off, 2012 SsangYong Chairman W is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1974 Mazda RX-2. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1974 Mazda RX-2 would be higher. At 3,199 cc (6 cylinders), 2012 SsangYong Chairman W is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 SsangYong Chairman W (222 HP @ 6600 RPM) has 103 more horse power than 1974 Mazda RX-2. (119 HP @ 6500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 SsangYong Chairman W should accelerate faster than 1974 Mazda RX-2.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 SsangYong Chairman W (296 Nm @ 4600 RPM) has 139 more torque (in Nm) than 1974 Mazda RX-2. (157 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 2012 SsangYong Chairman W will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1974 Mazda RX-2.
Compare all specifications:
1974 Mazda RX-2 | 2012 SsangYong Chairman W | |
Make | Mazda | SsangYong |
Model | RX-2 | Chairman W |
Year Released | 1974 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2292 cc | 3199 cc |
Engine Type | dual-disk rotary | in-line |
Horse Power | 119 HP | 222 HP |
Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 6600 RPM |
Torque | 157 Nm | 296 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 4600 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4160 mm | 5110 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1590 mm | 1895 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1495 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2480 mm | 2970 mm |